If you are seeking a unique ki/gi training method or are new to the concepts of internal energy, GiCheon will open your eyes to the possibilities within you

 

English

한국어

Pусский

 Suomi

 

 

 

Traces of Human Migrations in Helicobacter pylori Populations

Writers; Daniel Falush,1 Thierry Wirth,1 Bodo Linz ,1

Jonathan K. Pritchard,2 Matthew Stephens,3 Mark Kidd,4

Martin J. Blaser,5 David Y. Graham,6 Sylvie Vacher,7

Guillermo I. Perez-Perez,5 Yoshio Yamaoka,6 Francis Me´graud,7

Kristina Otto,8 Ulrike Reichard,1 Elena Katzowitsch,8

Xiaoyan Wang,1 Mark Achtman,1* Sebastian Suerbaum8

 1Department of Molecular Biology, Max-Planck Institutfu¨r Infektionsbiologie, 10117 Berlin , Germany . 2Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago , Chicago , IL 60637 , USA . 3Department of Statistics, University of Washington , Seattle , WA 98195–4322 , USA . 4Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520–8062, USA. 5Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York , NY 10016–9196 , USA . 6VA Medical Center , Houston , TX 77030 , USA . 7Universite´ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076 Bordeaux , France . 8Institut fu¨r Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universita ¨t Wu¨rzburg, Josef-Schneider Stra_e 2, 97080 Wu¨rzburg, Germany . *To whom correspondence should be addressed.Email: achtman@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de  

Helicobacter pylori, a chronic gastric pathogen of human beings, can be divided into seven populations and subpopulations with distinct geographical distributions. These modern populations derive their gene pools from ancestral populations that arose in Africa , Central Asia , and East Asia . Subsequent spread can be attributed to human migratory fluxes such as the prehistoric colonization of Polynesia and the Americas , the neolithic introduction of farming to Europe , the Bantu expansion within Africa , and the slave trade.  

    Geographic subdivisions exist for a variety of human pathogens and commensals, including JC virus (1), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (2), Haemophilus influenzae (3), and Helicobacterpylori (48). H. pylori, a Gram-negative bacterium that colonizes the human gastric mucosa for decades and does not spread epidemically (9), has the potential to be informative about human migrations (10). Sequence diversity within H. pylori is greater than that of most other bacteria (4) and about 50-fold greater than that of human beings (11). Furthermore, frequent recombination between different H. pylori strains (1214) implies that only partial linkage disequilibrium exists between polymorphic nucleotides within genes (15), which increases the information content for population genetic analysis.  

    In this report, we use a population genetic tool that we have developed (16) on a large, global sample of H. pylori isolates to define modern populations and reconstruct their ancestral sources. Previous data with 20 H. pylori isolates from East Asia , Europe , and Africa show that the sequences of fragments of seven housekeeping genes and one virulence-associated gene (vacA) differ according to the continent of origin (4). We sequenced the same fragments from 370 strains isolated from 27 geographical, ethnic, and/or linguistic human groupings (Table 1). Of the 3850 nucleotides sequenced for each isolate, 1418 were polymorphic and were used to define bacterial populations (15).

 

 Fig. 1. Relationships between modern populations (A), modern subpopulations (B), and ancestral populations (C) of H. pylori.The black lines show neighbor-joining population trees as measured by _ˆ, the net nucleotide distance between populations (15).The circle diameters indicate their genetic diversity, measured as the average genetic distance between random pairs of individuals. The larger circles in (A) versus (C) reflect the effects of admixture between ancestral populations. Filled arcs reflect the number of isolates (A and B) or nucleotides (C) in each population.Color coding is consistent in different parts of the figure, except for modern hpEurope, which is an admixture between the ancestral AE1 and AE2 populations.Scales are at lower right.

 

    The program STRUCTURE (16, 17) implements a Bayesian approach for deducing population structure from multilocus data by a variety of models, including the no-admixture model, which assumes that each individual has derived all of its ancestry from only one population. We used this model to identify four modern populations (15), designated hpAfrica1, hpAfrica2, hpEastAsia, and hpEurope on the basis of their current distributions (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). Further analyses split hpEastAsia into the hspAmerind, hspEAsia, and hspMaori subpopulations, and hpAfrica1 into hspWAfrica and hspSAfrica (Fig. 1B). These results confirm and extend previous data showing geographical subdivisions (4, 7, 8). Almost all H. pylori strains isolated from various countries in East Asia were assigned to the hspEAsia subpopulation. The hspMaori subpopulation was isolated exclusively from Maoris and other Polynesians in New Zealand , whereas the hspAmerind strains were isolated from Inuits and from Amerinds in North and South America . The hspSAfrica and hpAfrica2 populations were found only in South Africa , where they made up a majority of the strains isolated. The hspWAfrica strains were found at low frequency in South Africa but at high frequency in West Africa and also in the Americas , particularly among African Americans in Louisiana and Tennessee . The hpEurope population contained almost all H. pylori from Europeans as well as from Turks, Israelis, Bangladeshis, Ladakhis, and Sudanese. These bacteria were also isolated from the Americas and Australia , and from whites, blacks, and Cape Coloured in South Africa , where they were predominantly associated with whites.  

    The current global sample is still incomplete, and additional isolates from large parts of Asia and Africa and from aboriginal groups around the world will be needed to determine whether additional populations exist. However, our definition of seven modern populations and subpopulations provides a solid basis for deducing the global patterns of spread of H. pylori with their human hosts.  

    Our attempts to define subpopulations by the same method among the 200 hpEurope isolates were not successful because of inconsistent clustering (15). We hypothesized that this inconsistency reflected the complex history of Europe , which was populated in several independent waves of migration (18) of unknown genetic composition (19). We have therefore developed an approach, the linkage model in STRUCTURE, that can reconstruct ancestral populations even after substantial genetic hybridization (16). This approach uses the mosaic ancestry of genomes within breeding species, assigning individual nucleotides to ancestral populations on the basis of their linkage to neighboring nucleotides.  

    Analysis of the global H. pylori sample with the linkage model defined five ancestral populations (15), which we named ancestral Africa1, Africa2, EastAsia, Europe1 (AE1), and Europe2 (AE2) (Fig. 1C). H. pylori strains within modern hpEurope are recombinants between AE1 and AE2 bacteria. No single isolate possesses more than 80% estimated ancestry from either of these populations (fig. S1); instead, each genome is a mosaic of multiple small chromosomal chunks (Fig. 2, F and G; fig. S2). In contrast, the other populations are more homogeneous. Despite clear evidence for occasional import (Fig. 2, C and D), many isolates have derived 85 to 98% of their nucleotides from the ancestral population (Fig. 2, A and B; fig. S2).  

    Recombination between populations alters their genetic distances and blurs the branching order of trees (20). The ability to infer nucleotide pools in ancestral populations now allows more accurate estimates of ancestral relationships and evolutionary history. The ancestral population tree (Fig. 1C) suggests that Africa2 evolved before the other populations split and that AE1 and ancestral East Asia diverged from each other most recently. Additional detailed analyses (15) support these inferences.  

    Knowledge of ancestral gene pools also allows inferences about gene flow between populations. The high diversity in hpEurope (Fig. 1A) is due to fusion between AE1 and AE2. Within our sample, the proportion of AE1 nucleotides is highest in Finland , Estonia , and Ladakh (Fig. 3A). However, all European isolates also possess AE2 nucleotides, but only 3 of 17 isolates from Ladakh do so (fig. S1).  

    Similarly, AE2 nucleotides are most frequent in Spain , Sudan , and Israel , but the isolates from Sudan and Israel possess lower levels of AE1 than do European isolates. Thus, AE1 and AE2 probably reached Europe from different sources, AE1 primarily from the direction of central Asia and AE2 primarily from the Near East and North Africa .  

 

Code

 

 

Source

 

 

 

No.of isolates assigned to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hpAfrica1

hpEastAsia

 

 

Region

Country

Ethnic

Linguistic

hpEurope

hpAfrica2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hspWAfrica hspSAfrica hspMaori

hspAmerind

hspEAsia

1

East Asia

Korea

 

Korean

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

2

East Asia

Singapore

 

Sino-Tibetan

2

 

 

 

 

 

9

3

India

Ladakh

North Indian

Sino-Tibetan

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

India

 

Bangladeshi*

Indo-European

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Africa

South Africa

Black

Niger-Congo

2

7

 

17

 

 

 

6

Africa

South Africa

White

Indo-European

10

3

 

9

 

 

 

7

Africa

South Africa

Cape Coloured†

Indo-European

4

 

6

25

 

 

 

8

Africa

Burkina Faso

 

Niger-Congo

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

9

Africa

Senegal

 

Niger-Congo

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

10

Africa

Sudan

 

Semitic

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

N.America

USA

African American

Indo-European

3

 

10

 

 

 

 

12

N.America

USA

White

Indo-European

2

 

3

 

 

 

 

13

N.America

Canada/USA

Inuit

Eskimo-Aleut

4

 

 

 

 

8

 

14

N.America

Canada

Athabaskan‡

Na-Dene

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

15

S.America

Colombia

Mestizo

Indo-European

11

 

1

 

 

 

 

16

S.America

Colombia

Huitoto‡

Witotoan

12

 

 

 

 

4

 

17

S.America

Venezuela

Piaroa‡

Salivan

2

 

1

 

 

1

 

18

Australasia

New Zealand

Polynesian§

Austronesian

3

 

2

 

23

 

 

19

Australasia

Australia

White

Indo-European

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

Europe

UK

 

Indo-European

19

 

1

 

 

 

1

21

Europe

Estonia

 

Uralic

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

Europe

Finland

 

Uralic

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

Europe

Germany

 

Indo-European

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

Europe

Italy

 

Indo-European

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

Europe

Spain

 

Indo-European

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

Europe

Germany

Turkish

Altaic

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

Near East

Israel

 

Semitic

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other¶

 

 

 

5

 

2

 

 

 

5

Total

 

 

 

 

200

10

43

51

23

17

26

*Isolates from Bangladeshis resident in the UK are listed here as being from India . †Speak English but with elements of Khoisan. ‡Collectively referred to as Amerinds in the

text. §Polynesian isolates were from 18 Maoris, 8 Samoans, and 2 Tongans in New Zealand . _Includes two Basque speakers. ¶ “Other” summarizes unique isolates from

the following sources: hspEastAsia: Japan , China , Hong Kong , Thailand , and a Japanese from Peru ; hpEurope: France , Lithuania , Holland , Thailand , and an Asian in Cape Town , South

Africa ; hspWAfrica: Gambia and Guatemala .

                       

     Further reconstruction of the history of H. pylori is best done in the context of current knowledge about human migration. As with a human population tree (21), hpEurope derives from a short central branch between hpEastAsia and hpAfrica1 (Fig. 1A), hinting at a parallel history of intercontinental gene flow to Europe for humans and bacteria.  

    Furthermore, the relative contribution of AE2 versus AE1 correlates significantly with the first principle component of European human variation (table S1), which is thought to reflect the entry of neolithic farmers into Europe from the Near East (20). The second principle component has been tentatively attributed to the migratory fluxes that brought Uralic languages to Europe, and indeed correlated weakly with AE1 versus AE2 (r _ 0.6, P _.13) (table S1). It seems that neither AE1 nor AE2 was harbored by the original Paleolithic hunter-gatherers in Europe , because considerable AE1 or AE2 ancestry is found outside Europe , whereas Paleolithic Y-chromosome haplotypes are largely restricted to Europe (18). 

 

  Fig. 2. Ancestral sources of individual nucleotides in eight selected isolates.The origin of each polymorphic nucleotide (colors as in Fig. 1C) is shown for each of the eight gene fragments. The geographical sources of each isolate are shown above each graph.  

 

    Known human migrations can also explain the spread of hpEastAsia and hpAfrica1 populations (Fig. 3B). Current models (22, 23) agree that speakers of Austronesian languages (Maoris and other Polynesians) arrived in New Zealand after sequential island-hopping that is likely to have resulted in repeated human population bottlenecks. Indeed, consistent with population bottlenecks, the genetic diversity within the hspMaori sample is extremely low (Fig. 1), and the pattern of nucleotide polymorphisms within subpopulations implies that there has been strong drift in the evolution of the hsp-Maori population (15) (fig. S3). The isolation of hpEastAsia from Native Americans (7, 8) can be similarly explained by hpEastAsia’s being carried during the colonization of the Americas that began at least 12,000 years ago. Unlike hspMaori, hspAmerind did not show signs of strong drift, implying that H. pylori accompanied the ancestors of modern Amerinds and Inuits in large numbers of individuals and/or was introduced on multiple occasions.  

    The high degree of similarity between hspWAfrica and hspSAfrica (Fig. 1B, fig. S3) is concordant with the low genetic distances (20) observed between speakers of the Niger-Congo family of languages and is consistent with hspSAfrica’s being carried to Southern Africa during the rapid expansion of Bantu farmers from central West Africa (24). Given this scenario, one possibility to account for the extremely distinct hpAfrica2 population is that they colonized the Khoisan hunter-gatherer inhabitants of Southern Africa , who fall on one of the deepest branches of an African human population tree (20) and are very distinct from Bantu.  

    Modern migrations of slaves from West Africa to the Americas and of Europeans to South Africa , the Americas , and Australasia are probably responsible for the current existence of hspWAfrica and hpEurope in these and other locations (Table 1). According to this interpretation, the past few centuries since modern human migrations were too short for the distinctions between multiple bacterial populations to become blurred. The assignments of particular human migrations to migrations of H. pylori populations can allow dating of the bacterial population tree by archaeological events.

    The five ancestral populations existed before the separation of hspAmerind from the other hpEastAsia populations (Fig. 1, B and C), which is estimated to have occurred at least 12,000 years ago. Accordingly, H.pylori has probably accompanied anatomically modern humans since their origins.  

 

    Fig. 3. Putative modern and ancient migrations of H. pylori. (A) Average proportion of ancestral nucleotides by source.Numbers correspond to the codes in Table 1 and colors are as in Fig.1C. ( B) Interpretation.Arrows indicate specific migrations of humans and H. pylori populations.BP, years before present.  

 

    The high sequence diversity in H. pylori allows the recognition of distinct populations after centuries of coexistence in individual geographic locations, as demonstrated in the Americas and South Africa . Even after thousands of years of contact in Europe between bacteria introduced by distinct waves of migration, residual shortrange linkage  disequilibrium has allowed us to identify ancestral chunks of chromosome. Thus, analysis of H. pylori from human populations could also help resolve details of human migrations.  

    Elucidation of the pattern of population subdivision is also of medical relevance (25). Geographically variable results regarding the association of putative virulence factors with disease (26) might well reflect differences in the local prevalence of the individual H. pylori populations. Similarly, the development of diagnostic tests, antibiotics, and vaccines needs to account for global diversity and will be aided by the availability of representative isolates.  

 

References and Notes

1. H.T.Agostini, R.Yanagihara, V.Davis, C.F.Ryschkewitsch, G.L.Stoner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 14542 (1997). 2.K. Kremer et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 2607 (1999). 3. J.M.Musser et al., Rev. Infect. Dis. 12, 75 (1990). 4.M. Achtman et al., Mol. Microbiol. 32, 459 (1999).

5.D. Kersulyte et al., J. Bacteriol. 182, 3210 (2000). 6. A.K.Mukhopadhyay et al., J. Bacteriol. 182, 3219 (2000). 7.Y. Yamaoka et al., FEBS Lett. 517, 180 (2002). 8.C. Ghose et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 15107 (2002). 9. R.A.Feldman, in Helicobacter pylori: Molecular and Cellular Biology, M.Achtman, S.Suerbaum, Eds.(Horizon Scientific, Wymondham , UK , 2001), pp.29 –51. 10. A.Covacci, J.L.Telford, G.Del Giudice, J.Parsonnet, R.Rappuoli, Science 284, 1328 (1999). 11. W.H.Li, L.A.Sadler, Genetics 129, 513 (1991). 12. D.Kersulyte, H.Chalkauskas, D.E.Berg, Mol. Microbiol. 31, 31 (1999). 13.D. Falush et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 15056 (2001). 14.S. Suerbaum et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 12619 (1998). 15.Materials and methods, details of the STRUCTURE analysis, and analysis of the pattern of divergence between populations are available on Science Online. 16. D.Falush, M.Stephens, J.K.Pritchard, in preparation; available at www.mpiib-berlin.mpg.de/str2.pdf. 17. J.K.Pritchard, M.Stephens, P.Donnelly, Genetics 155, 945 (2000). 18.O. Semino et al., Science 290, 1155 (2000). 19. L.Chikhi, R.A.Nichols, G.Barbujani, M.A.Beaumont, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11008 2002). 20. L.L.Cavalli-Sforza, P.Menozzi, A.Piazza, The History and Geography of Human Genes (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994). 21. E.S.Poloni, L.Excoffier, J.L.Mountain, A.Langaney, L.L.Cavalli-Sforza, Ann. Hum. Genet. 59, 43 (1995). 22. J.M.Diamond, Nature 403, 709 (2000). 23. S.Oppenheimer, M.Richards, Sci. Prog. 84, 157 (2001). 24.C. Ehret, Int. J. Afr. Hist. Stud. 34, 5 (2001). 25. J.F.Wilson et al., Nature Genet. 29, 265 (2001). 26. D.Y.Graham, Y.Yamaoka, Helicobacter 5 (suppl.1), S3 (2000). 27.We thank all the colleagues listed in the supporting online text who have supplied bacterial isolates, DNA, and information and C.Josenhans for critical reading of the manuscript.Expert technical assistance was provided by S.Friedrich, A.Wirsing, and E.Bernard. Supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ac 39/10-3, SFB479/TP A5), the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und Forschung Pathogenomics Network, and NIH (RO2GM63270).

 

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/299/5612/1582/DC1

 

Materials and Methods

Supporting Text

Figs.S1 to S3

Tables S1 and S2

References

26 November 2002 ; accepted 16 January 2003

 

BackHomeUp

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2010  Korea GiCheon Association. All Rights Reserved. Legal statement